All Things Family Law

Discussion of all things related to Indiana family law from an Indiana divorce attorney.

This blog provides general family law and divorce law information. If you have a specific issue or case you need assistance with please contact me directly.

Holiday Schedule 2013-2014, Under the New and Old Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines 2013

Each year I update this post to make it relevant for the upcoming Thanksgiving and Winter Break parenting time. Holiday parenting time is often a source of confusion, and this year is more complicated because there are two sets of Guidelines what may apply.  For information about which set of Guidelines apply, please see my general Parenting Time Guidelines page.

This posting will provide the specific language of both the "old" Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines and the "new" Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines, if your child's Winter Break is from Friday, December 20, 2013 and the first day back will be Monday, January 6, 2014.  These times are consistent with the Carmel Clay School Corporation academic calendar. For links to your school system calendar see my "Indiana Schools" page which offers information about all Indiana school corporations.  Please note that the holiday parenting time is controlled by when a child gets out of school, therefore, your situation may not follow this interpretation. To discuss this further please contact me.

 Here is what the "old"  Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines presently say about the winter holidays:

HOLIDAY PARENTING TIME SCHEDULE (Under the Old Guidelines). 

Christmas Vacation. One-half of the period which will begin at 8:00 P.M. on the evening the child is released from school and continues to December 30 at 7:00 P.M. If the parents cannot agree on the division of this period, the custodial parent shall have the first half in even-numbered years. In those years when Christmas does not fall in a parent’s week, that parent shall have the child from Noon to 9:00 P.M. on Christmas Day. The winter vacation period shall apply to pre-school children and shall be determined by the vacation period of the public grade school in the custodial parent’s school district.

In years ending with an even number, the non-custodial parent shall exercise the following parenting time: [1] New Year’s Eve and New Year’s Day. (The date of the new year will determine odd or even year). From December 30th at 7:00 P.M to 7:00 P.M. of the evening before school resumes. [4] Thanksgiving. From 6:00 P.M. on Wednesday until 7:00 P.M. on Sunday.

After reviewing the Guidelines, if your child gets out of school on December 20th and goes back on January 6th, one interpretation of the Guidelines for the winter holidays in 2013-2014 is as follows:

  • Thanksgiving Break - with custodial parent in 2013; 
  • Winter School Break - with the noncustodial parent from December 20th at 8 p.m. until December 25th at noon, then the custodial parent would have the child from December 25th at noon until December 30th at 7 p.m., whereupon the noncustodial parent would have the child from December 30th at 7 p.m. until January 5th at 7 p.m. 

Typically the guidelines give the parent who does not have Christmas day the right to have the child noon to 9 p.m. on Christmas day; however, this year if the child's school gets out on December 20th, the Winter Break division is on December 25th.

Here is what the “new” Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines say about the winter holiday (note: the new guidelines still refer to the school Winter Break as a “Chirstmas Vacation”:

HOLIDAY PARENTING TIME SCHEDULE (Under the New Guidelines). 

 The Christmas vacation shall be defined as beginning on the last day of school and ending the last day before school begins again. Absent agreement of the parties, the first half of the period will begin two hours after the child is released from school. The second half of the period will end at 6:00 p.m. on the day before school begins again.  Each party will receive one half (1/2) of the total days of the Christmas vacation, on an alternating basis as follows:

1. In even numbered years, the custodial parent shall have the first one half (1/2) of the Christmas vacation and non-custodial parent shall have the second one half (1/2) of the Christmas vacation.

2. In odd numbered years, the non-custodial parent shall have the first one half (1/2) of the Christmas vacation and custodial parent shall have the second one half (1/2) of the Christmas vacation.

3. In those years when Christmas does not fall in a parent’s week, that parent shall have the child from Noon to 9:00 P.M. on Christmas Day.

4. No exchanges under this portion of the rule shall occur after 9:00 p.m. and before 8:00 a.m., absent agreement of the parties.

 New Year’s Eve and New Year’s Day shall not be considered separate holidays under the Parenting Time Guidelines.

Thanksgiving. From 6:00 P.M. on Wednesday until 7:00 P.M. on Sunday, shall be exercised by the noncustodial parent in even numbered years and the custodial parent in odd numbered years.

After reviewing the new Guidelines, if your child gets out of school on December 20th, at 3:00 p.m. and goes back on January 6th, there are 16 days and 1 hour of winter break.  One interpretation of the Guidelines for the winter holidays in 2013-2014 is as follows:

  • Thanksgiving Break - with custodial parent in 2013; 
  • Winter School Break - with noncustodial parent from December 20th until      December 28th, but the custodial parent would have the child on December 25th from noon to 9 p.m., then the custodial parent would have the child from December 28th until January 5th at 6 p.m.

It is also important to note that the “new” Guidelines clarified the hierarchy between holiday parenting time and regular parenting time, and state that sometimes, due to holiday parenting time, a parent may have 3 weekends in a row.  However, the “old” Guidelines are not consistent with the “new” Guidelines on these points.  So there are not only different holiday schedules, but also different rules regarding how to set the regular parenting time schedule after the holidays, i.e. who has the weekend following the holidays.  Remember that “existing parenting time orders in effect on March 1, 2013 shall be enforced according to the parenting time guidelines that were in effect on the date the parenting time order was issued.” 

To discuss this please contact me. To see all of my postings on this topic search here

Looking for the "old" guidelines? Go here.

Obamacare / PPACA & Indiana Divorce - Indiana Divorce Law 2013 and 2014

 

Under the PPACA, every individual, regardless of marital status, will be required to obtain individual health care coverage.  This represents a drastic change from the nation’s previous health care practices and requirements. While the enactment of the PPACA will inevitably result in major changes in the health insurance industry, the PPACA may also have a profound effect on the institution of marriage in the United States.  Indeed, the incentive to marry solely to obtain health care coverage will seemingly be eliminated. Conversely, particular provisions of the PPACA, especially those allowing low-income individuals to obtain tax reductions in order to pay for health insurance, may actually incentivize certain individuals to abstain from marriage or seek divorce. Furthermore, certain provisions of the PPACA may also have an effect on child support and spousal maintenance payments.  

To keep this topic updated I created a page in this blog that I will update as the PPACA and Indiana Divorce Law develops.  Go here for the  “Obamacare” / PPACA & Indiana Divorce Law page.  

Emancipation and College Expenses - Littke vs. Littke - Indiana Child Support Law 2013

Indiana law regarding emancipation and college expenses (also called post-secondary expenses) has changed dramatically in the last couple years.  The recent case of Littke v. Littke, summarizes and reviews this law and how it applies.  

Littke involves the situation where a divorced couple with children’s divorce decree did not contain a provision regarding post-secondary educational expenses.  When the parties’ daughter turned nineteen, in 2012, mother “filed a motion to emancipate and terminate child support.”  While acknowledging that there was “no existing order for postsecondary educational expenses,” Father nevertheless requested the trial court order mother to contribute to their child’s post-secondary education expenses.  

After the parents agreed that the child was emancipated, and that Mother did not have to pay further child support, Mother filed a motion to dismiss the father’s petition for postsecondary education expenses, arguing that “[a] parent may assert emancipation of a child as a defense to a petition seeking an order for educational needs where no order providing for educational needs was entered prior to emancipation.” Mother also contended that Father’s petition was “untimely” because Father filed the petition after the child was emancipated.  The trial court granted the Mother’s motion to dismiss, and the Father subsequently appealed.

In discussing the issue, the Court of Appeals examined Ind. Code § 31-16-6-6. First, the court noted that the Indiana Legislature amended the statute in 2012 , “chang[ing] the presumptive age for termination of child support from twenty-one to nineteen[.]” The court also observed that the Indiana Legislature again modified the statute in 2013, “with an emergency retroactive effective date of July 1, 2012[,] and added subjections (c) through (e) that address a parent's or child's ability and the timing to file a petition for educational needs following the 2012 Amendment.”  Specifically, the court acknowledged that Ind. Code § 31-16-6-6(a)(1) stated,

(a) The duty to support a child under this chapter, which does not include support for educational needs, ceases when the child becomes nineteen (19) years of age unless any of the following conditions occurs:

(1) The child is emancipated before becoming nineteen (19) years of age. In this case the child support, except for the educational needs outlined in section 2(a)(1) of this chapter, terminates at the time of emancipation, although an order for educational needs may continue in effect until further order of the court.

 (Emphasis added by court). The court further noted that Ind. Code § 31-16-6-6(c), which was added by the 2013 amendment, provides that “[i]f a court has established a duty to support a child in a court order issued before July 1, 2012, the: (1) parent or guardian of the child; or (2) child; may file a petition for educational needs until the child becomes twenty-one (21) years of age.”

Applying these statutory changes to the issue at hand, the court observed that the trial court had entered its judgment granting the Mother’s motion to dismiss in 2012, before the Indiana Legislature amended Ind. Code § 31-16-6-6 to add subsection (c). Importantly, the court observed that, “subsection (c) of that statute clearly allows a parent, who had a child support order issued before July 1, 2012, to file a petition for educational needs until the child becomes twenty-one years old,” and because the statute has a retroactive effective date of July 2012, subsection (c) was applicable to this case.  Indeed, the record “reaveal[ed] that there was a child support order issued before July 1, 2012 and that [the child] was less than twenty-one years old at the time Father filed the petition for postsecondary educational expenses.”  Therefore, under Ind. Code § 31-16-6-6, the Father’s postsecondary petition was not untimely. 

 If you would like to discuss this topic further, please contact me

The review or transmission of information at this site is not legal advice and does not establish an attorney-client relationship.   All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. I make no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. Should you be seeking legal advice, I recommend you retain an attorney. Please contact me  here.